Kevin has a quote of the day up on his blog regarding Reality TV. Call it a quiet day but I'm going to jump on his coattails on the subject and ride along.
I don't watch "reality TV" because, frankly, it isn't "real". At least not "real" in the sense of "real life". Kevin's quote highlights the difference. I'd like to expand on it.
My wife loves reality TV. Regularly watches the various Survivor and Amazing Race incarnations. I don't. To me, they are glorified games. Now, admittedly, if I got chosen for either game, I'd play but I have no illusions about it being anything other than that. They only interact with reality as in terms of day-to-day life in matters of travel, food and sleep. Everything else is scripted and constructed to entertain the masses.
Who serious believes assembling an over-sized puzzle on a sandy beach or digging through a pile of manure to find a coin constitutes reality? I've been to many places where these shows could be and I have never seen an over-sized orange puzzle piece being carried by a woman in a do-rag running from one place to another.
Amazing Race is simply travel hassles writ-large. Any business traveler, especially a salesman worth their salt, should be able to whip the asses of any of these couples handily. What these people on this show stress over is par for the course in any busy world business traveler on a weekly basis.
Then there's Survivor. Other than the locations, which can be beautiful, this show holds no attraction to me. The utter fakeness of it just turns me away. First, who in their right mind decides to spend 40 odd days living on an island in a pair of shorts or a bikini, a pair of sandals and a do-rag and somehow think that's enough? End result is the highly entertaining aspect of watching these idiots shiver in the rain hiding under large leaves.
Right. It's why lots of people can't take it seriously as some kind of life challenge. Do you honestly believe these people are going to experience anything beyond mild discomfort? Sure, the players complain about hunger and lose weight over the play time but the studio isn't going to let them starve. Or get into distress due to dehydration. They're just griping and whining like spoiled children.
Hell, I'd go on the show just as a weight loss exercise. At least it would be peaceful and have good scenery. Kind of hard to take it seriously as "Survivor" in the commonly understood meaning of the term when there's no serious threat of harm or death.
Anyone who's been a Boy Scout would have had shelter built, a fire pit dug and a fire burning and some kind of water source identified before the sun set on the first day. These people sit and shiver for weeks on end and somehow think they're tough and "surviving".
If I landed on this show, I'd be bringing a rain poncho, a good set of military fatigues (for durability), a pair of broken in boots, a pair of shorts and a long sleeved white shirt, suntan lotion, a good sized pocket knife and a flint or a 9 volt and some steel wool (to start fires). It might be hot but long pants and long sleeves will make you infinitely more comfortable over the long haul and keep the worst effects of the sun off. Then I can play the game properly. I suspect a lot of readers and other bloggers would be doing similar things. A lot of us have been Boy or Girl Scouts, been in the military and/or have been raised with practical skills.
Alas, I think the studio arranges it so these people are more photogenic and deliberately suppress such intelligence. Wouldn't look good on TV to see a guy sitting by a fire in a floppy hat shrugging off the rain as "no big deal". And where would the ratings be if male viewers didn't have an abundance female skin to look at? Screw practicality, this is Reality!
The best part of it is the players have such low expectations when they say the game changes them fundamentally. Apparently these folks have never had the pleasure of doing a Boy Scout camp or survival weekend. Or done a forced march for 6 or 8 hours in 100 degree heat wearing a wool uniform. Yet these folks think they're doing something extraordinary.
Pussies, the lot of them. They need to get out more.
Here's my version of "Survivor"....
Find an old 70-100 foot wooden schooner. Equip it with sails, charts, GPS, tools, spares, manuals on boat handling, navigation and seamanship and a full set of provisions for a dozen people for 2 weeks. But no engine or generator but a battery bank and human-powered charger. Then we sail or tow said schooner into the middle of the Atlantic off the coast of Florida half-way to the Cape Verde Islands in the middle of the hurricane season. The boat will be equipped with remote cameras and satellite tracking for the viewers. No life rafts but one life vest per person and a water-activated 406Mhz EPIRB bolted to the topside in a floating breakaway box that cannot be opened but will let water into when immersed.
Then you fly our lucky "Survivors" out to the schooner and drop them into the water with a simple set of instructions: Get the schooner back to Florida. Then fly off, tune into the cameras and watch the fun! If they make it back, they win.
Now that's a proper game of Survivor!
No contrived contests, no pecking order, no voting people off unless you count throwing them overboard. They'll learn the proper meaning of "Reality TV" the first time they encounter a tropical storm at sea and 20 foot seas. Then they'll understand the meaning of the word "reality". If the boat breaks, they'll have the means to repair it and keep it afloat. If they fail, the EPIRB will activate and give them a fighting chance at being rescued assuming they stay together and hold onto the EPIRB. No guarantees of a successful rescue but very few things in life are guaranteed either. So it will be a natural reflection of reality as the rest of us perceive it.
If they get low on food or store it improperly, better learn to fish quickly or ration what's left. Freshwater supply gets contaminated? Learn to catch rainwater. Rudder breaks? Brush up on your jury rigging and swimming skills. Lights or GPS go dark? Learn to pedal.
Somehow, I don't think any networks will like my idea. Too raw and dangerous. Yet, many people sail off over the horizon and do such things with some regularity. Not a lot of people but enough. It isn't an extraordinary feat or a game. It is merely one path in the journey of life. Yet some of the so-called "Survivors" would find it life changing and at least then, they'd be somewhat correct from their perspective. If nothing else, it would be a true challenge with real consequences for failure or due to a simple intervention of Fate against them.
In other words, true reality. And that would never sell. But I bet a lot of people would tune in to watch. I would.
I don't watch "reality TV" because, frankly, it isn't "real". At least not "real" in the sense of "real life". Kevin's quote highlights the difference. I'd like to expand on it.
My wife loves reality TV. Regularly watches the various Survivor and Amazing Race incarnations. I don't. To me, they are glorified games. Now, admittedly, if I got chosen for either game, I'd play but I have no illusions about it being anything other than that. They only interact with reality as in terms of day-to-day life in matters of travel, food and sleep. Everything else is scripted and constructed to entertain the masses.
Who serious believes assembling an over-sized puzzle on a sandy beach or digging through a pile of manure to find a coin constitutes reality? I've been to many places where these shows could be and I have never seen an over-sized orange puzzle piece being carried by a woman in a do-rag running from one place to another.
Amazing Race is simply travel hassles writ-large. Any business traveler, especially a salesman worth their salt, should be able to whip the asses of any of these couples handily. What these people on this show stress over is par for the course in any busy world business traveler on a weekly basis.
Then there's Survivor. Other than the locations, which can be beautiful, this show holds no attraction to me. The utter fakeness of it just turns me away. First, who in their right mind decides to spend 40 odd days living on an island in a pair of shorts or a bikini, a pair of sandals and a do-rag and somehow think that's enough? End result is the highly entertaining aspect of watching these idiots shiver in the rain hiding under large leaves.
Right. It's why lots of people can't take it seriously as some kind of life challenge. Do you honestly believe these people are going to experience anything beyond mild discomfort? Sure, the players complain about hunger and lose weight over the play time but the studio isn't going to let them starve. Or get into distress due to dehydration. They're just griping and whining like spoiled children.
Hell, I'd go on the show just as a weight loss exercise. At least it would be peaceful and have good scenery. Kind of hard to take it seriously as "Survivor" in the commonly understood meaning of the term when there's no serious threat of harm or death.
Anyone who's been a Boy Scout would have had shelter built, a fire pit dug and a fire burning and some kind of water source identified before the sun set on the first day. These people sit and shiver for weeks on end and somehow think they're tough and "surviving".
If I landed on this show, I'd be bringing a rain poncho, a good set of military fatigues (for durability), a pair of broken in boots, a pair of shorts and a long sleeved white shirt, suntan lotion, a good sized pocket knife and a flint or a 9 volt and some steel wool (to start fires). It might be hot but long pants and long sleeves will make you infinitely more comfortable over the long haul and keep the worst effects of the sun off. Then I can play the game properly. I suspect a lot of readers and other bloggers would be doing similar things. A lot of us have been Boy or Girl Scouts, been in the military and/or have been raised with practical skills.
Alas, I think the studio arranges it so these people are more photogenic and deliberately suppress such intelligence. Wouldn't look good on TV to see a guy sitting by a fire in a floppy hat shrugging off the rain as "no big deal". And where would the ratings be if male viewers didn't have an abundance female skin to look at? Screw practicality, this is Reality!
The best part of it is the players have such low expectations when they say the game changes them fundamentally. Apparently these folks have never had the pleasure of doing a Boy Scout camp or survival weekend. Or done a forced march for 6 or 8 hours in 100 degree heat wearing a wool uniform. Yet these folks think they're doing something extraordinary.
Pussies, the lot of them. They need to get out more.
Here's my version of "Survivor"....
Find an old 70-100 foot wooden schooner. Equip it with sails, charts, GPS, tools, spares, manuals on boat handling, navigation and seamanship and a full set of provisions for a dozen people for 2 weeks. But no engine or generator but a battery bank and human-powered charger. Then we sail or tow said schooner into the middle of the Atlantic off the coast of Florida half-way to the Cape Verde Islands in the middle of the hurricane season. The boat will be equipped with remote cameras and satellite tracking for the viewers. No life rafts but one life vest per person and a water-activated 406Mhz EPIRB bolted to the topside in a floating breakaway box that cannot be opened but will let water into when immersed.
Then you fly our lucky "Survivors" out to the schooner and drop them into the water with a simple set of instructions: Get the schooner back to Florida. Then fly off, tune into the cameras and watch the fun! If they make it back, they win.
Now that's a proper game of Survivor!
No contrived contests, no pecking order, no voting people off unless you count throwing them overboard. They'll learn the proper meaning of "Reality TV" the first time they encounter a tropical storm at sea and 20 foot seas. Then they'll understand the meaning of the word "reality". If the boat breaks, they'll have the means to repair it and keep it afloat. If they fail, the EPIRB will activate and give them a fighting chance at being rescued assuming they stay together and hold onto the EPIRB. No guarantees of a successful rescue but very few things in life are guaranteed either. So it will be a natural reflection of reality as the rest of us perceive it.
If they get low on food or store it improperly, better learn to fish quickly or ration what's left. Freshwater supply gets contaminated? Learn to catch rainwater. Rudder breaks? Brush up on your jury rigging and swimming skills. Lights or GPS go dark? Learn to pedal.
Somehow, I don't think any networks will like my idea. Too raw and dangerous. Yet, many people sail off over the horizon and do such things with some regularity. Not a lot of people but enough. It isn't an extraordinary feat or a game. It is merely one path in the journey of life. Yet some of the so-called "Survivors" would find it life changing and at least then, they'd be somewhat correct from their perspective. If nothing else, it would be a true challenge with real consequences for failure or due to a simple intervention of Fate against them.
In other words, true reality. And that would never sell. But I bet a lot of people would tune in to watch. I would.
